Today, I administered a pre-assessment to a group of 6
students to test their understanding of food chains and food webs. They paired
up and were given ten minutes to draw and label a food chain and food web that
represents the food they eat on a daily basis. During this process, students
were encouraged to think about the “big picture”, keeping in mind the various
trophic levels involved in producing the many forms of food we eat. I started
the activity by modeling a food chain and food web of my own, drawing it on the
board and labeling the parts to assist students who needed additional support
to understand the directions.
The students discussed their ideas with their partners,
quickly brainstorming before sketching their diagrams. Overall, the process was
quite fluid, as students were able to incorporate many elements into their
diagrams while pausing at times to reflect on their thoughts and ideas. I
walked around the room to monitor students’ progress, providing feedback when
necessary.
I was quite impressed by the diagrams that were submitted.
Their accuracy revealed an adequate understanding of food chains and food webs,
and varied in complexity among the groups. What I found the most interesting
about this pre-assessment activity is that it allowed students to explore their
knowledge to create new knowledge, and generated a compelling discussion after
the groups shared their diagrams with the class.
The pre-assessments were evaluated based on the following
rubric, which effectively addresses the elements that were required in
students’ work for proper assessment:
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Drawing - details
|
All assigned details have been added. The details
are clear and easy to identify.
|
Almost all assigned details (at least 85%) have
been added. The details are clear and easy to identify.
|
Almost all assigned details (at least 85%) have
been added. A few details are difficult to identify.
|
Fewer than 85% of the assigned details are present
OR most details are difficult to identify.
|
Accuracy
|
95% or more of the assigned structures are drawn
accurately and are recognizable. All assigned structures are labeled
accurately.
|
94-85% of the assigned structures are drawn
accurately and are recognizable. All assigned structures are labeled
accurately.
|
94-85% of the assigned structures are drawn
accurately and are recognizable. 94-85% of the assigned structures are
labeled accurately.
|
Less than 85% of the assigned structures are drawn
AND/OR labeled accurately.
|
Labels
|
Every item that needs to be identified has a label.
It is clear which label goes with which structure.
|
Almost all items (90%) that need to be identified
have labels. It is clear which label goes with which structure.
|
Most items (75-89%) that need to be identified have
labels. It is clear which label goes with which structure.
|
Less than 75% of the items that need to be
identified have labels OR it is not clear which label goes with with item.
|
The
students seemed to enjoy using their creative skills to draw their diagrams,
and had sufficient prior knowledge to complete the project. In fact, some
students were able to create complex diagrams that incorporated elements not
found in nature that interact within our food chains and food webs, such as factories and laboratories where many processed foods are created. Therefore,
the pre-assessment activity was quite successful, and was not in need of
immediate improvement. If I were to make any changes, however, I would integrate
the use of multiple senses and technologies to create a more dynamic,
interactive activity.